Friday, March 7, 2014

Privacy

The same government that argues that the Constitution protects a woman's "Right to Privacy" over her body, so that she may kill a baby residing therein,
also argues that she has no right to privacy over her e-mails, cell phone conversations or freedom from aerial surveillance while relaxing in her back yard.

5 comments:

  1. Liberals haven't gone wild. They're crazier than an outhouse rat.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Nice comparison Ed! I agree with Jess. Irreconcilable differences. We no longer belong to the same species. The difference is that an outhouse rats behavior does not cause us to stand knee-deep in the excrement.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Were there ever truer words? Good thinking, Ed.
    Jess is right and, as usual, DaBlade nails it..........knee-deep is right.
    AND WHO IS DOING ANYTHING TO STOP THE LOSS OF AMERICA AS WE KNOW IT?
    Answer: nobody
    All that happens is that Darryl Issa holds yet another useless hearing which is always guaranteed to wipe an important subject off the map.

    ReplyDelete
  4. A woman can kill an unborn child without being held accountable, but if a man gives her an abortion pill, he gets sent to prison. I just don't understand how a fetus can be considered nothing under the law, then something under the law. Doesn't anyone see the craziness?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Actually ladies,(and I am so honored to have you stop by) the answer to both your questions is, I do,

    ReplyDelete