I spoke with Mark Tapson about his recent Substack articles regarding Work and Prayer, Masculinity and we talked about Spiritual Warfare.
Mark hosts the Right Take with Mark Tapson.
You can listen here Your American Heritage 5 17 2025
You can read it here:
Ed Bonderenka (01:00):
I've said it before, I'm going to say it again. Probably
say it again For years. As long as I'm doing this show, there is a war going on
for control of America and you and it is a spiritual warfare. It's a struggle
to enslave mankind and it's been going on since before we arrived on this
planet. As an aside, I suggest you find The Unseen Realm by Michael Heiser. I
do not say this lightly and yet I do not say believe everything he says, but
listen to it, research it.
So how do we fight back? We get organized preferably to
good church. We go to court, we educate our neighbors. We support those who
take the battle to the enemy and we support those who are running for office
that support Godly values. And then we make sure they do and we arm ourselves
intellectually.
Ed Bonderenka (03:53):
Oh, thank you. My guest today is Mark Tapson. Mark's been
on the show a few times and I like having smart people on. So I look smart by
association. Mark's a writer almost everywhere. I'm not going to list
everywhere he writes. He's a writer, he's a screenwriter, he's a homeschooling
father of six, so he's a warrior. He's a culture warrior. He writes on Substack
as Culture Warrior and at Mark Tapson, and he's the host of the Right Take with
Mark Tapson broadcast or podcast, which I listened to regularly. And I'll be
replaying one of his podcasts during the second hour, very highly informative
podcast. And I thought, why should I reinvent the wheel? And I got Mark's
permission to re-broadcast and you will enjoy that. He's on X as Culture Warrior
@MarkTapson and he's a Knight Templar in a former life. Who knew? Welcome back,
Mark.
Well, I first want to mention the passing of David Horowitz. I think I
mentioned it a show or two ago, but you as a fellow of the David Horowitz
Freedom Center, would you speak about his passing briefly?
Mark Tapson(05:01):
Yeah, absolutely. Let me interject there real quickly
before I forget. I just want to emphasize what you mentioned at the outset
about spiritual warfare. And I want to second that motion because we are
definitely in a period of intense and intensifying spiritual warfare. And I
also want to recommend the book that you recommended Unseen, the Unseen Realm
by Michael Heiser, who died just a couple of years ago actually. And my best
friend, Brian Gawa, who is a screenwriter, was friends with Michael Heiser and also
highly regards his work. So I too recommend that book Unseen Realm and
everything else that Heiser writes. But as far as spiritual warfare goes, we
are definitely engaged in it. In fact, my men's group at my church is putting
on a spiritual warfare retreat in a couple of weeks where I'm going to speak
and talk about that because it's something that it's easy to forget that we're
in spiritual warfare because we get focused on the politics or on the culture,
but there's this whole other realm beyond and behind all of that that is really
where the battle is taking place. And if we're not focused on that, then we
we're not going to win in the political or cultural realms either.
Ed Bonderenka (06:17):
Before you go on about David, then let me add to what you
just said. By the way, there is a YouTube video, the Unseen Realm. It might be
easier for you to watch that video rather than read the book. And there's also
a book called Supernatural, which is a summation of the Unseen Realm, which is
more readable if that's what you like. And it's a little less expensive on
Amazon too, but something's going on. When I was a kid, I used to read comic
books, well actually guiltily enough, I read 'em as an adult too that we call
them, what do you call 'em? Graphic novels. And there used to be some called
The New Gods and this and that Marvel characters and I used come on the Thor
and Loki stuff always drove me nuts. And now there's stuff going on. There
really is stuff going on.
Ed Bonderenka (07:06):
And you watch, I‘ve mentioned it here before, you watch
Babylon Five and which I think is one of the finest science fiction TV series
ever. And there's some characters in the background called the Vorlons and
they're sort of the good guys. And then there's these other characters called
The Shadows that nobody sees except a few people and they inform their
characters who do bad things. And so it kind of correlates to the fact that
there are spiritual forces that speak to people and motivate them to do good or
evil. And I watch political characters sometimes and I think who are they
listening to? So if you want to fill in on that, go ahead before I ask you to
talk about David Horowitz.
Mark Tapson(07:55):
No, that's a good point. Well said. I wasn't aware that
there was an Unseen Realm video on YouTube. I might check that out myself.
Ed Bonderenka (08:01):
And you can listen to it on Spotify, also the audio
version, which is where I first caught it. So I was driving and I said, man,
there's a lot of musical interludes in here. This must be on YouTube.
Mark Tapson(08:17):
Well, David Horowitz, for those people who might not know
David Horowitz for the last 40 years or so has been one of the real
intellectual powerhouses of the conservative movement and a real driver and
fighter for our side. The David Horowitz Freedom Center, which is the nonprofit
that I worked for was founded decades ago. And David founded it not as another
think tank, but as a battle tank. And David, his background is very interesting
because a lot of conservatives, myself included, he started on the left,
although he started way, way farther left than I did, I was what you would
consider a classical liberal. Now, and the conservatives are actually classical
liberals, but David grew up the son of full-fledged communists. I mean, he was
a red diaper baby and grew up as a communist himself. He was a far left radical
who worked with the Black Panthers and supported the far left agenda.
Mark Tapson(09:25):
He even wrote a couple of books supporting that cause. And
then along with his co-writing partner who has also passed away a few years
ago, Peter Collier, they had a political epiphany of sorts and a complete 180
conversion for various reasons, which I won't go into here. But essentially
they saw the light politically and began to write for conservatism. And David
since then has written, I don't know, dozens of incredible powerful books in
support of freedom and conservatism and American culture and liberties. And I
just can't say enough about his influence on me and countless other Americans.
He died just about a month and a half ago, I think at the ripe old age of 86.
So it was not untimely or unforeseen, but I'm telling you, the guy fought to
the last breath because I know personally I work with him that literally until
the last day, he was writing as much as he could, and working to fight for our
cause.
Mark Tapson(10:46):
And that's one of the things that David taught me and many
other conservatives, is to take off the gloves and get in the fight because
conservatives have this tendency to sort of play by the rules. I mean, not that
we shouldn't play by the rules, but David came from the left and he understood
the left better than they understood themselves because he knew all of the
ideological background and the Marxist indoctrination. He understood all that
on an intellectual level and understood that conservatives need to fight also,
that we need to get in the gutter and fight sometimes on their own terms, on
the left's terms. And that's what Trump does. That's one of the things that
Trump does that has made him so successful against the left and it drives the
left so crazy is because he fights on their level and they can't deal with it.
They're used to conservatives like Mitt Romney or John, oh, what's his name?
McCain. McCain, yes, John McCain. We're used to noble losers as David put it
like that. And Trump comes along and he takes the gloves off and fights and it
makes the left insane. They don't know how to handle his mockery, for example,
which is their strategy. That's their tactic.
Ed Bonderenka (12:08):
That's an Alinsky tactic.
Mark Tapson(12:09):
That is exactly right.
Ed Bonderenka (12:11):
Exactly. Exactly. And it's funny, he also drives a lot of
people on the right nuts too. That's true. I have a friend who writes a blog
and almost every other day her post is, oh, I wish Trump would be quiet. I wish
he wouldn't talk like that. He's going to alienate people. And the rest of the
commenters, are you kidding me? This is Trump whole package, what you get.
That's why he is where you
Mark Tapson(12:33):
Yeah, and it's fine. Personally Trump's not my style
either. I personally had to come to terms with some aspects of his personality
that I would not ordinarily be in favor of. But as you put it, the whole
package works very well for conservatism. And I think that's what a lot of
establishment conservatives are very uncomfortable with. Well, of course a lot
of establishment conservatives don't want the boat rocked at all so that
they're opposed to Trump for much the same reason that the left is. But yeah,
Trump makes me uncomfortable sometimes too. But the alternative is someone who
is nice and polite and plays by the Markus of Queensbury rules as they say,
like am Mitt Romney and conservatives like that just get steamrolled by the
left. So we have to learn to fight to win. And that's what David Horowitz
taught
Ed Bonderenka (13:37):
Exactly. And we have a guy who when he gets shot at stands
up, says, oh yeah, fight.
Mark Tapson(13:41):
Fight. Instead of ducking down,
Ed Bonderenka (13:43):
he's standing right
Mark Tapson(13:45):
Up there. Exactly. Or apologizing for offending someone,
Ed Bonderenka (13:50):
Speak for bleeding on your microphone. No,
Mark Tapson(13:52):
It's not.
Ed Bonderenka (13:55):
And by the way, we're going to take calls in the second
half of the show, so if we say something that triggers a comment, we'll let you
bring it up later and feel free to call in then. But for right now, I just want
to set some ground rules, but basis for the conversation here. For instance,
like I said, I listen to Mark's podcast and I read his substack. I actually
subscribe and get the elements in my mail so I know what's going on. And you
had something that really struck me and a couple months ago, I think ago, and I
said, I got to get Mark on. I got to get Mark on. Actually, by the way, I had
David Horowitz on a couple years ago, and I've been saying the same thing. I’ve
got to get David back on and I waited too long, so I won't wait so long.
Ed Bonderenka (14:40):
Next time again for you that Ora and Labora the value of
work you wrote on that, I thought that really strikes home because I've had
these conversations. I want to tread lightly here because I have a lot of
friends, I have relatives who are retired now and ask me why am I not retired?
And this is not a criticism of anybody, frankly. My brother works harder now.
He likes to say that all the time. I dunno, I had time to work before because I
worked so hard in retirement, doing work for other people, doing good for other
people. And I like what I'm blessed to what I do for a living, and I find
creative output in it, even though it's telling a machine what to do, I do it
creatively. I can't point to anybody else and say, do you see how cool I did
that? Nobody else knows. But yeah, there's value of work. You want to speak to
that for a bit?
Mark Tapson(15:46):
Yes. I think it's really important. I think especially for
men, and I write a lot about men and masculinity, it's important for everybody
to feel that they have purpose in life, that they don't just have a job that
they go to in some kind of eight to five job. And there's nothing wrong with
that, but people need to feel that the work that they do is more than just
clocking in and clocking out and earning a paycheck. It needs to be something
that is meaningful to their soul and sense of identity. And so I wrote an
article which I think it was called Ora et Labora, which is Latin for prayer
and work. And it's a phrase that's associated with a sixth century monk named
Benedict St. Benedict, who started the Benedictine order and Benedictine
basically almost, I don't want to say he invented monasticism, but the
Benedictines were really a monastic order that took off and popped up all over
what at the time was a Europe that was mired in the dark ages. I mean the
Middle Ages in their entirety were not dark, but certainly the beginning period
of the Middle Ages, the first few hundred years after the collapse of the Roman
Empire, when things went, it was just chaos and disorder and barbarism upon.
Mark Tapson(17:17):
Yeah, because all of the structures of Roman civilization
had kind of collapsed. And so the only real locus or loci of civilization were
monasteries where all of the previous works of the classics and things like
that, and also intellectual works of monks and early Christians were preserved
and added to throughout the centuries. But anyway, St. Benedict wrote a famous
rule for monastic living and he promoted the idea of aura. At labora prayer and
work, we usually think of monasticism as being very contemplative and
spiritual, but Benedict believed that prayer and work formed a kind of
partnership of labor that engaged not only your body, but also your spirit and
united body and spirit. And I think that's really important for people to aim
for in their lives and in their work, something that nourishes both their body
and spirit. Because if work is undertaken in the right frame of mind, then
there's a kind of humbling, spiritually nourishing aspect to it, and that's
very meaningful to people.
Mark Tapson(18:38):
And in that respect, hopefully you don't have to retire.
Hopefully you can find some way to continue work in a prayerful fashion. And
even if you're not religious or not Christian, you could view it as a
meditative form of work. But in any case, either way, bringing a sort of a
prayerful focus to your productivity adds a meaningful dimension to it. It
makes your life worthwhile. So that's what the article was largely about. And I
went on about a personal experience that I had about a mentor, that I had a professor
and a friend who really embodied that whole aura at Labora way of life, and I
learned a lot from that. So that's what that article is about.
Ed Bonderenka (19:25):
Yeah. You actually apprenticed at his house, so you helped
him remodel his house, right?
Mark Tapson(19:32):
Yes. And that also has a kind of medieval aspect to it
because the cathedrals, the cathedral building was sometimes a centuries long
process that involved dozens if not hundreds of people, and sometimes
generations of people because there were lots of people who worked on
cathedrals, who started the cathedral had been started before they were born,
and it kept going after they died. So cathedrals were really a work in
progress. The cathedrals was sort of the architectural embodiment of aura at
Labora, something that's kind of an ongoing work of praise and worship. And my
friend who was a professor and mentor, as I said, I helped him for a summer,
actually a whole year, helped him for a whole year remodeling his house. But it
was an ongoing project. It was never his intention to actually finish working
on the house. I learned that after a while, it was something that his wife had
grown accustomed to and just kind of accepted was the fact that her husband was
going to constantly be hammering somewhere in the house because that was his
form of worship, I think was building on that house and doing productive,
meaningful, spiritually engaging work.
Mark Tapson(20:58):
And I learned that from him about working on his house.
Ed Bonderenka (21:03):
It's funny you mention it like that, and I was thinking
about this yesterday and the day before because speaking about always working
on your house, just yesterday my son came over and helped me finish tiling the
hallway in my house, which has been since the water damage of last late summer.
And the wood came up, I put ceramic tile down and I did about half it. He did
about half it. It's been sitting there waiting to be grouted, and I just hate
grouting and I don't like getting down on my knees these days so much. And so
he said, come on, let's do it. Let's do it. We did it. And we looked back at
that and I thought for one, we had a sense of fellowship working together on
this,
Ed Bonderenka (21:46):
A real sense. I look back on that hallway even now and I
look like, wow, that's something we did together. It's done. It didn't come out
horrible. It came out looking rather nice after all, for all the fear I had of
screwing it up. I don't know why, I've done tile before, but it's been about 10
years and you just get kind of antsy. I was working on a friend of mine's
brakes the other day. I came home from work and I had him pull his truck in the
garage and then I, oh, you need this and now you need that. Now it’s run out to
the store and get this. And it just became a long project. Yeah, I took the
afternoon off and I was working at it into the evening and he looked at me and
he says, you like doing this, don't you?
Ed Bonderenka (22:31):
And I said, I don't like doing this so much. I like doing
it. I like punching my man card to prove I can still do this stuff. But the
other thing is, is that I get a satisfaction out of helping people, and I'm not
trying to be careful here and not sound as self aggrandizing or anything like
that, but I just like being able to be of value to other people by doing stuff
for other people. And then there's a sense of bonding. There's a sense of
bonding, working on stuff. If my brother and I are swapping an engine out or
something like that, he said, well, that's the only time we ever visited was
when we're working together on vehicles. I said, yeah, but it's so satisfying.
We look back and say, we did that
Speaker 5 (23:13):
And
Ed Bonderenka (23:14):
We've probably only got a minute left. And I just want to
say, you don't want to get so wrapped up that all your self image is in your
work to where you have No,
Speaker 5 (23:25):
No,
Ed Bonderenka (23:26):
Yeah, you don't relate to anybody else or your kids, go
ahead.
Mark Tapson(23:30):
No, you got to have balance. You can't be the kind of, or
it's not good anyway, to be the kind of guy who is so obsessed with career that
he neglects his family or comes home from work after his kids have already gone
to bed. Because you have to find the right kind of balance to make sure that
the various dimensions of your life as a man are not neglected. It's great to
have a career, but you've also got a family, and so you need to learn to
prioritize those kinds of things. That's something I've had to work on myself.
Ed Bonderenka (24:03):
Yeah, I get what you mean. Unfortunately, when I was
younger, I worked the afternoon shift and that's just part of the job. And so I
missed my kids in the evening a lot and I regret that to some degree. I'd take
evenings off to go to ball games and the like, but that's just the way it works
sometimes. Derek says, we got a minute left, we got 30 seconds left. That's
about the length of the music. So we can take this conversation up after the
break. And folks, I hope you come back. We're talking to Mark Tapson and come
on back, your American heritage
Speaker 1 (24:55):
Front lines
Ed Bonderenka (24:57):
Standing
Ed Bonderenka (24:58):
Afraid. Well, welcome back to your American heritage,
today's Mark Tapson day. He's my guest and he's going to be hosting his guest
on my show the second hour. So don't get confused when you tune back in after
the break. It'll be Mark interviewing somebody that he was talking to. And I
thought, that's so great. I want my audience to be able to hear that. And he
was gracious enough, despite all his disclaimers on his broadcast about
unauthorized rebroadcasting, this is authorized, so that's good. We were talking
about the value of work and we're talking about spiritual warfare. If you want
to call in, the number is (734) 822-1600. Oh, look at that. We have a caller
already. So Derek, who's calling? It's your wife Sherry. Oh, and now for a word
from our sponsor. Hi Sherry.
Speaker 6 (25:55):
Hi sweetheart. When you first started talking with Mark,
you mentioned spiritual warfare. So not to take away from what you were last
talking about, but it made me think about a man that I was sitting at the table
with yesterday. When I was down in the dining room with my dad, he asked me if
I had seen the movie The Exorcist. We had started talking about Christianity
and he asked me if I'd seen the movie The Exorcist, and if I knew what it was
about. And I said, yes, I'd seen the movie. And yes, I knew what it was about.
And he said, so do you believe in all that speaking in tongue stuff? And I
said, I do believe in speaking in tongues. I said, but speaking in tongues,
when you're praying in the Holy Spirit versus being demon possessed, I said,
there's a big difference in this exorcist with being about demon possessed
that's not praying in the Holy Spirit and talking to the Lord through with the
Holy Spirit talking through you. And I think if we don't teach the people the
right way, the right things, people need to know what they're being taught, not
just hearing words, then they're not going to learn correctly. The same with
anything political or spiritual. So I don't know, that just made me think of
that when you guys were saying that.
Ed Bonderenka (27:23):
Alright, well thanks for joining and I'm going to talk
about this after you hang up a bit. It brings the memory something. So thanks
for joining us and thanks for the call and thanks for the coffee. So my wife
and I went to a church and speaking of this is germane to the conversation
because I talked about watching people and wondering what their motivations
are. I ran into a guy and I said, Hey, we met this guy. And I says, I like this
guy. Let's get together for dinner sometime with our spouses. And so the guy
says, I'm not so sure that would work. And I was at work a couple days later
and I really felt the spirit of God was telling me, call him up and have a
dinner date with him tonight. And so I put it off, I put it off, off, and it
kept popping up in a minute.
Ed Bonderenka (28:12):
And then somebody called me and distract me. And then, so
I'm driving home undistracted, and it's like all of a sudden I'm reminded call
that guy for dinner tonight. So I call him up, he says, well, probably, I'm not
sure it would be a good idea. It's a spiritual demonic opposition, blah, blah.
I was like, what do you want on your pizza? My wife and I are bringing pizza.
What do you want on your pizza? Give me your address. So I called Sherry and
she orders us a pizza and we go over there and the guy's sitting in his house
and the whole house is dark except for a single lamp. I mean, this looked like
a movie, like a horror movie, single lamp over the dining room table. Wife is
sitting there and she has this clouded dark look over her face and she's not
happy to see us.
Ed Bonderenka (28:52):
And he and I go talking. He tells me about some events
that took place recently in his house. And so I'm leaving. I says, come to
church tomorrow night. Make sure you come to the Bible study tomorrow night. He
says, yeah. I says, I'm telling you, come to the Bible study tomorrow night. He
went to the Bible study. His wife stood up at the very beginning of the guy
teaching, said something about the blood of Christ. She stood up, started
cursing like a sailor and walked out. He followed her. And these are people who
went to a Christian Church. They were saved. Everybody knew they were saved,
but something got into her. And I know how it worked, and that's not germane to
the story, but regardless, we went back in the the foyer while I told the
teacher, I says, join us and have everybody pray, obviously pray.
Ed Bonderenka (29:34):
Okay. So we got a whole church full of people praying,
well, this guy's name was Ed too. He comes in the back of the church, says, I
want you to lay hands on her and pray for her. He laid hands on her and prayed
for her. We stood around and prayed and all of a sudden her face just lightened
up. That was it. It was all over. No green puke, no nothing. But there was
definitely something there. We did not go back to church with them. It was kind
of embarrassing for them. And we went out to ice cream and coffee with them
instead. And he and I are at the register while they're sitting outside on the
sidewalk and we're looking at each other and he says, I don't know either, but
I'm just glad that's over. And the thing is, is that I watch people on the news
and you go like, are they demonically possessed or oppressed or what's
motivating them to do that? And there's some people that just, they're opening
themselves to do it, but I don't think they've done it yet. But part of the
discernment is knowing what to do about it. And it's part of the spiritual
warfare, but then you see it on a grander scale on the political stage, let's
say.
Ed Bonderenka (30:42):
That was pretty heavy. Sorry about that. Do you have any
comment on that before we take a call?
Mark Tapson(30:48):
Well, yeah, and it's funny, I remember seeing The Exorcist
in the theater. There had never been a horror movie like that before. It caused
quite a controversy. And I think it's because it really exposed or pulled no
punches about the real horrific evil that is behind demon possession. And
that's part of this whole spiritual warfare. And I think people witnessed this
kind of evil, at least in the movie screen for the first time ever when that
movie came out. The book also is very good, by the way, but I do think that if
you look around at the political world, you can see demonic activity. I mean,
some of the progressive radicalism I think can really be described only in that
way as demonic activity. I think if you look at some of the drag queen, drag
queen story hour, the whole drag queen phenomenon. Now if you look at some of
these drag queens, they look like demons.
Mark Tapson(32:04):
This is not the drag of Jack Lemon and what was the movie?
Some like It Hot. This is not, it's not Benny Hill dressing up like a woman.
This is a whole other level of exaggeration about feminine characteristics. And
some of these drag queens look like demons straight out of hell. I think that's
no coincidence. I think it's because there's demonic activity pushing that
aspect of progressive politics. But anyway, there's definitely spiritual
warfare going on and manifesting itself in the political realm. And you can see
it in some of the progressive radicals who scream the protesters who are
screaming insanely. It's not politics as usual. There's something driving it
that's really evil.
Ed Bonderenka (32:59):
Yeah, exactly. Well, we have a call from Joe Leonard from
Wyandot, and it's not surprising that Joe would call, since I opened the phone
lines, Derek, could you put Joe on please?
Speaker 7 (33:14):
Hello brother. How are you today?
Ed Bonderenka (33:17):
Fine, brother, yourself. Go on.
Speaker 7 (33:19):
Oh, like I always say, could be better, could be worse,
right? We had our pro-life thing this morning, I just got home. But two, the
work shall set you free. You're speaking die diehard. Yeah, of course the Nazis
put that above the concentrations camp completely warping. Of course, forced
labor is the opposite of setting anyone free. But indeed the Bible that makes
sense still. And it makes the distinction between the unable who we are to be
our brother's keeper and help widows and orphans and all that, versus the
unwilling, which we have no obligation to. And to follow that up to get your
reaction, how it ties together with the idle hands phrase,
Ed Bonderenka (34:22):
Workplace of the devil.
Speaker 7 (34:24):
Yep. Yeah, I mean those all tie together. Skipping the
whole Nazi warping of it. That's a valid biblical thing.
Ed Bonderenka (34:39):
Yeah. If I might, I misquoted the phrase above Auschwitz.
It's aright Rey, which is work makes free. Come on, you kidding me? This is or
Orwellian, you know what I mean? The perversion of the language. But that's a
good point, Joe. We'll ask Mark to talk about that a bit.
Mark Tapson(34:58):
That is a good point. It depends on what you're working
toward or working for or whom you're working for. I mean, the communists also
would say that people should always be engaged in work, but work for the state
because the state is their God.
Mark Tapson(35:17):
So they don't intend for it to be spiritually meaningful,
but to just be working always as kind of a slave for the state. I think Ben
Franklin said, be always employed in something useful, but cut off all
unnecessary actions. He said, of course Ben Franklin a little bit, he was kind
of intense, but I don't think he intended that we just maintain a sort of a
perpetual busyness just for its own sake. As Henry David Thore said, it's not
enough to be industrious because the answer industrious, what are you industrious
about? So then are you committing yourself to work for the state or work
because of enforced slave labor or are you doing it as a sort of a prayerful
work for the to glorify God and to glorify his name through your work and
through what you do? So it depends
Speaker 7 (36:22):
On absolutely to tie that all back together. Yeah, working
for oneself and others through biblical community. Free will and choice, not
communistic, worldly forced and theft of most of your labor for others, there
has to be free will in there is kind of what we're all tying together here.
Mark Tapson(36:52):
That's right. That's a good point.
Speaker 7 (36:54):
Alright, love brothers. Take care. God bless.
Ed Bonderenka (36:57):
Alright, talk to you later. Thank you. Yeah, yeah,
exactly. I mean, even my dad was a coal miner and he used to tell me about how
he'd be on a cart on his back and going up and chiseling away and then loading
16 tons and what do you get? And then he'd actually be paid by how much he
produced. But there comes a point where I was an assembly line worker, nowhere
near the same kind of drudges as that. But you go in and you work the torque
gun, you put the parts in and you can look at it as like, oh, it's a trap job.
Or you can say, you know what, if I do my job, I get paid for this and
somebody's car is going to run right. As long as we all work together and do
this, everybody does their part. Somebody's going to get a car out of this and
it's going to run. And I get a paycheck and benefits and get to go home in one
piece. So it doesn't have to be the most creative job. I hate to be a Robert
cheerleader or something like that. But really it just depends on how you
choose to view your work. I suppose it is.
Mark Tapson(38:03):
Yes.
Ed Bonderenka (38:05):
So something else you talked about the topic that you
talked about were manicures and manliness. That's pretty interesting. I was
driving back from the diner this morning, a guy had kind of a Rasta hairdo on
walking down the street and he had beads on the end of each one of his. They're
not corn rows, so they're just braided locks coming down around him. And I
thought, doesn't strike me as manliness. But then again, if you watch the
movies, the Predator Alien Hunters, they had that same dew. I like to keep a
good manicure on my fingers, keep my fingernails clean and look presentable,
but I'm not going to wear makeup. But Jesse Waters, you watch Water's World at
all sometimes you ever see him with his rules for men, you don't drink with a
straw and you don't lick an ice cream cone. You're like, this guy does not look
to me like the guy who's the arbiter of what real men do or don't. But
Mark Tapson(39:14):
You want to speak on the subject. Yeah. The reason my
article was called Manicures and Manliness is that I was spinning off of
something I had read about these two entrepreneurs who created a program called
Hard as Nails, which was an experiment to have men or research participants,
men who would have their nails manicured, not just manicured but painted like
women. And in the process of that, the whole idea or the purpose was to explore
men's attitudes about their own manhood and manliness. And the idea was to get
them to open up about feeling suppressed by toxic masculinity or by stereotypes
of manhood that they're expected to live up to. But instead inside they're just
pressure feeling this incredible pressure of rigid masculine expectations. And
that's really the left's view of masculinity, this notion of toxic masculinity.
The left believes that masculinity itself is toxic, not that there's just a
toxic version of it, but that masculinity itself is the problem and that it's
nothing but a social construction.
Mark Tapson(40:37):
There's nothing natural about it. The same thing with
femininity. The Left believes that these are all social constructions that
we're enforced on men and women by a patriarchal, oppressive society. And that
if we could just liberate ourselves from these rigid stereotypes, so the
thinking goes, then we'll all be free and we can all be all genders. We don't
have to present ourselves in certain ways. We can just go with the flow. So one
day if we feel more feminine than another, we can claim to be a different
gender. And the whole gender madness, it's a neo-Marxist idea that is designed
to break down our understanding of masculine and feminine and our understanding
of the roles of man and woman. Because this goes back to Marx's priority, which
was the abolition of the family. Marx explicitly wanted the abolition of the
family. And the reason for that is that the family is sort of the first and
last line of defense against the kind of collectivist totalitarian society that
Marx wanted or Marx envisioned as a utopia in order to make his dream come
true. This utopian, although it's actually dystopian, but
Mark Tapson(42:05):
In order to bring about the kind of society that Marx
wanted, he had to break down the relationships between men and women. And to do
that, you break down our understanding of masculinity and femininity. So that's
really what is behind all of these things like the left, pushing gender
ideology and trying to claim that men can be women and vice versa. They want to
say that there is nothing natural about this, that it's all socially
constructed and weak, and therefore it can be deconstructed in order to liberate
us all. So my article kind of explored that whole idea, and as I said, what it
comes down to, the whole agenda behind it is the breakdown of the family. And
you can see that happening over the last half century in America or in the West
in general, the breakdown of the family. That is because cultural Marxism has
been so successful, it's been way more successful over the last 60, 70, 80
years than economic Marxism, which fails everywhere that it's tried.
Mark Tapson(43:14):
So the Marxists realized this early on. They thought this
whole economic Marxism idea isn't really bringing about the Grand Revolution we
expected it to. We got to find another way. So they begin to focus on the
culture where Marxism is extremely effective or the Marxist agenda I should
say. So that's their focus now is the breaking down of the family. And you can
see it in all of its gender ideology that's being pushed. This is why the left
works so hard to start as young as possible, indoctrinating kids in the idea
that gender is merely constructed and that you can choose to be a boy or a
girl, and that you were born in the wrong body. Somebody assigned you your sex
at birth. That's what's behind. And driving all of this gender nonsense.
Ed Bonderenka (44:07):
Part of that is a social program that says, by the way,
your poor, you should have the man move out of the house so that we can give
you
Ed Bonderenka (44:20):
Social programs, but if the man moves in the house, you're
not eligible because he should be the wage earner, which is exactly true. So
you just encourage this absence of manhood from the childhood of these poor and
fortunate kids, and then they lose that role model. And then now their moms are
single moms. And then the state comes along and says, by the way, you don't
have a role model, but let us tell you, you could be anything you want. And you
probably are not a really a boyer. You're really not a girl. You're probably
not a
Speaker 3 (44:57):
White Christian, cisgender male.
Ed Bonderenka (45:00):
I love that. Ever since I heard that I had to copy that.
Yeah. So yeah,
Mark Tapson(45:05):
Go ahead. I was just going to say that yes, the whole
reliance on the state is part of the Marxist idea also because Marx wanted not
only men to be the labor force, but women too. The whole idea of feminism was
to liberate women from this oppressive role as mother and a wife and put them
out in the workforce as well, working for the benefit of the state. And
children should be raised collectively by the community. That was the whole
Marxist ideal. And it's all for the benefit of the state. And that's why they
needed to break down the family. And that's why feminism has been the tip of
the spear of Marxism for the last half century. And now transgenderism has
supplanted feminism as the whole tip of the spear of cultural Marxism.
Ed Bonderenka (45:58):
Yeah. You also wrote about war men and the soul of the
West, and we don't have time to get into that, but as you were speaking, I was
thinking of the disaster. I'm not against war, don't get me wrong. I mean, I
don't think I'd rather have a peaceful solution like Trump. I'd rather have a
peaceful solution, but hey, here's the carrot, here's the stick. And you got to
fight for what you got to fight for. But then again, Paul Harvey imitation
here, if I were the devil, I would probably have a World War I and a World War
ii, which would kill so many of the men, that the women would be left without
partners and they'd be willing to have multiple, they'd be willing to share the
partners they have. And then, oh, we have this big war effort. All the men are
off to war.
Ed Bonderenka (46:38):
So all the women got to go to work. And then the war is
over, and all the women are like, I don't want to go back in the house. I kind
of enjoy making my own money. Said, there's two sides of that coin. Yeah, you'd
be independent, but then decide what is really, and this goes back to biblical
theology, teaching, whatever. What does God want for you to do? What does God
want for the man to be and for the woman to be? And is there a time where you
say, okay, I did that for a season. Now I'm going to be a mother and I'm going
to work in the house and raise these kids because there's nothing wrong with
that. You yourself are homeschooling eight kids? Oh, well, five. Five.
Mark Tapson(47:23):
Okay.
Ed Bonderenka (47:24):
Oh six. I'm sorry, I said six and you're telling me five.
Okay. Yeah. It seems like eight sometimes. Doesn't they be honest, seems like
Mark Tapson(47:30):
Eight. They can be a handful, but they're good kids. And
if we'd gotten started earlier on kids, we would have more because they're just
an incredible blessing.
Ed Bonderenka (47:41):
Sorry, you caught me with coffee in my mouth. No worries.
I've got one minute left. So with the time remaining, why don't you plug some
of your efforts and then I want to remind people that you are going to be
basically featured in the second hour of this show as you interview Josh
Hammer. Thank you, Josh Hammer. And so I appreciate you letting me broadcast
that, but go ahead and plug some of your work. Tell us where people can find
you.
Mark Tapson(48:13):
Thanks, Ed. Yeah, the best place to go is my Substack account, which is https://substack.com/@marktapson. Or you can go to substack.com and look for Culture Warrior. And that's me. That's where most probably most of my writing is. Otherwise I write for, and sometimes there's overlap I write for,
Ed Bonderenka (48:32):
We've got 15 Seconds left. Oops, I'm sorry about that.
Mark Tapson(48:34):
No Worries.
Ed Bonderenka (48:35):
Alright, Mark, thanks a lot folks. Come on back. You're American Heritage.
Many hands make light work. :)
ReplyDeleteBAYSIDER
Always ridiculed the leftie meme that the "patriarchy" forces women into monogamous relationships with men when the natural state of men wants the opposite! Marriage entails man (and woman) subordinating their will to God's design. The left gender nonsense has at its base the desire to undo the good things of God. He made uniqueness and separation. They make chaos. Marx loved Mephistopheles (Faust), and his favorite line: everything that exists deserves to perish. God was a competitor to communist control of man, body mind and spirit. And cleansing religion was not to be a private affair, but the government's business. (The Devil and Karl Marx, Paul Kengor)
ReplyDeleteBAYSIDER
Jay Vernon McGee said that Karl Marx, as a young man, was quite a well informed Christian. That he wrote things that others thought were prescient concerning the faith.
DeleteHe was. It made him dangerous. I highly recommend Paul Kengor's book above. "Marx fancied himself a poet, as a calling. His poetry is filled with savagery, fascination with corruption and violence, suicide pacts [2 of his daughters killed themselves in a suicide pact] and pacts with the devil - intense pessimism, rebellion. One of his characters, him, is not destroying the world because he hates it, but is doing so in order to spite God, out of derision and mockery against the Creator. He is a rebel, like Satan."
DeleteBAYSIDER
Boy, I'd love to interview you on the air. Or at least have your commentary on subjects.
Delete