The same government that argues that the Constitution protects a woman's "Right to Privacy" over her body, so that she may kill a baby residing therein,
also argues that she has no right to privacy over her e-mails, cell phone conversations or freedom from aerial surveillance while relaxing in her back yard.
5 comments:
Liberals haven't gone wild. They're crazier than an outhouse rat.
Nice comparison Ed! I agree with Jess. Irreconcilable differences. We no longer belong to the same species. The difference is that an outhouse rats behavior does not cause us to stand knee-deep in the excrement.
Were there ever truer words? Good thinking, Ed.
Jess is right and, as usual, DaBlade nails it..........knee-deep is right.
AND WHO IS DOING ANYTHING TO STOP THE LOSS OF AMERICA AS WE KNOW IT?
Answer: nobody
All that happens is that Darryl Issa holds yet another useless hearing which is always guaranteed to wipe an important subject off the map.
A woman can kill an unborn child without being held accountable, but if a man gives her an abortion pill, he gets sent to prison. I just don't understand how a fetus can be considered nothing under the law, then something under the law. Doesn't anyone see the craziness?
Actually ladies,(and I am so honored to have you stop by) the answer to both your questions is, I do,
Post a Comment