There are many instances of damage and death that the ChiVi shots are causing
(while protocols exist that make harm from ChiVi almost nil).
Yet the media and government insist that you take these shots.
You are being forced to acknowledge that 2+2 does indeed equal 5.
1984 was prophetic
Definitely going to be interesting... And NOT in a good way.
ReplyDeleteSigh....
DeleteI think I will stick with the Word.
ReplyDeleteAlways a good choice.
DeleteSo true. So sad. 5,000 deaths now reported in the CDC's VAERS database. Some people try to dismiss those injuries. “That’s not much compared to the millions who’ve been vaccinated.” Etc. Well, with the swine flu they thought 53 deaths were enough to stop that vaccine after 45 million people had it.
ReplyDeleteI was sorry to read one doctor took it upon himself to file a false report in VAERS. How awful! Many doctors REFUSE to submit a case. Others say they never heard of it. As I've written elsewhere, correlation is not causation, but essential to uncover patterns and improve vaccine safety. Fortunately, in the internet age people don’t have to rely on refusniks to post info for them, and you can do it yourself.
I hooted at a dismissal I read last night that authorities had "checked out" those reported deaths and concluded "nothing to see here folks" within days. THAT’S NOT POSSIBLE according to a researcher who participates in the verification of injury process. He laid out the steps and timeframe it would take to look into that many reports. More like months. They lied.
In a courtroom when you find out one side is lying about big stuff, you naturally ask “what else are they lying about?” Good question!
It’s a proven tragedy that VAERS only captures about 1 injury in 100. That’s not my guess, but the conclusion of a Harvard study the CDC itself commissioned. Re-affirmed this year in a major New England medical system study of covid vaccine injuries in a large sample population of 60,000. (Where did you hear THAT in the news?) So I translate 5,000 proximate deaths to at least 50,000 if not 500,000. It’s hard to ignore a death, but easy to ignore its nexus to a vaccine if all you hear is a drumbeat that’s not so.
Dr. Fleming’s work on this is chilling. Totally supports your comment Ed about solutions. He outlines many from dozens of clinical studies he participated in. Ready for a reasoned, 4-hour full Monty? https://thehighwire.com/videos/live-from-event-2021-in-dallas-tx/
Don't mention that on another blog we frequent.
DeleteIt's not open to discussion. I probably will refrain from there for a while. Again.
I am absolutely convinced that our government is at war with us.
That's not an easy thing to say. And I know I'm late to the party saying it. But why else push this trash on the public.
The Tuskegee airman was nothing compared to this.
Agree. I also respect the work any good blogger puts into blog posts and maintenance, especially including our friend. I had a post up and ready to go, came back hours later to 'post', saw the comment and deleted. And I emphasize RESPECT, not agreement, as I'm sure you know.
DeleteI'll have some blockbuster quotes later from Dr. McCullough when I transcribe. He was the source of the info on what it takes to review VAERS info.
PS: the bullshit about vaccines being 94% "effective" is a slight of hand. Effective compared to another vaccine. Absolute reduction of cases is 0.74% in one, and I think another got as high as between 1-2%.
ReplyDeleteFollow the money.
When somebody can explain to me what the effectiveness is a rating of (can't catch, can't spread, or can't die) then we can talk effectiveness.
DeleteI wrote on FB that what they now call asymptomatic we used to call "not sick".
Well, "effective" to me is absolute reduction of cases minus cases of side effects. Even the "cases" are being diddled with. A "case" is now determined by a 40-cycle (over sensitive) test in non-vaccinated, and a 28-cycle (less sensitive) test in the vaccinated. FIBLA!! (Fudge, I'm Being Lied At)
ReplyDeleteActually, what I meant is that the goalposts are being moved.
Delete1) The vax is to keep you from catching ChiVi.
2) Oh no. The vax is to prevent you from getting very sick, not from catching ChiVi. And you can still spread it.
3) Actually, it's to keep the spread of ChiVi down.
Pick one.
Ed, you seem to have a problem believing what the government tells you. Remember, these are important evil imbeciles making trillions off of the ignorance they've planted and harvested throughout the American population.
ReplyDeleteRealize they can lie minute by minute, admit the lies the next minute, and still get people to believe their BS a minute later.
I may not get anything anymore, including the flu shot as I wouldn't put it past them to stick this garbage in that.
Screw me once shame on you... Screw me twice.....
DeleteAll planned out... first to accept being controlled....then opening our country up to billions of people to the point that Americans will react. DeSantis moving National Guard into Texas? Add the results of the election audits..a total setup.
ReplyDeleteStates moving troops because feds don't act? A civil war in motion.
Delete