Would shooting fish in a barrel be so easy if fish could shoot back?
Of course not.
So when you hear about a school shooter, office shooter, civic center shooter, church shooter, mall shooter, newsroom shooter or any other democrat who goes on a shooting spree in a confined area where normal people, citizens, are not allowed to have a gun,
think to yourself:
What if fish could shoot back?
I could wax (ineloquently) on this topic for years. I can't wrap my mind around the tenet that otherwise freedom embracing people would prefer only agents of the State to be armed.
ReplyDeleteIt occurred to me that if people saw themselves as the fish and not the "fisherman", they might get it.
Delete"Be polite, be professional, but have a plan to kill everybody you meet."
ReplyDeleteSimilar?
While the Incredible Mr. Limpet was not actually armed, his full throated trumpet call could turn an oncoming torpedo making him some lethal sushi indeed. Since hollering at oncoming bullets doesn't work for the rest of us, I guess I'll settle for help from my friends, Smith and Wesson.
ReplyDeleteI knew I could count on you.
DeleteYep, you got it!
ReplyDeleteI'm 100% confident the cowardly pukes who have been involved in most of the mass shootings would have never done so if they knew people would shoot back at them. I understand gun free zones was a joe biden idea. There is no end to the carnage defecrat pieces of satan human garbage vermin feces have done to the USA. Part of the blame belongs with the citizens.
ReplyDeleteThe citizens who vote the totalitarians into office who strip them of their inheritance.
DeleteDramatic 'decrease' in the population of bad guys, for one...
ReplyDelete