Thursday, September 24, 2020

What Is The Proper Response To Tyranny?

 What is the proper response to watching a woman get tazed by a "school resource officer" for not wearing a mask outdoors?

We all know cops can ignore minor infractions at their discretion.

But this guy decided to taze her. Because of a stupid mask law.

Outside. And then he's not wearing one.

I know the visceral reaction I have to watching it.

And then to arrest worshipers outdoors?

If they had been rioting, they'd have been ignored.


Is it proper to rescue a citizen from abuse?

20 comments:

Pascal said...

I think so. I question if I would rise to the ocassion. It hasn't happened yet in my presence.

DaBlade said...

Were there no men in the stands? Ridiculous. And just who is the JA that called them?

Ed Bonderenka said...

So, I've heard from conservatives that we should not interfere with the police. Let the courts work it out.
I'd probably be missing work today had I been there.
I'm looking for validation.

Anonymous said...

Unfortunately, you'd be in a lose-lose situation regardless of the 'over-zealousness' of the LEO. Depending on the state, you'd find yourself charged with a number of criminal violations, even if you tried to effect a 'citizen's arrest' on the LEO. No prosecutor is likely to charge the officer based on the Citizens intent to protect...the best you could hope for without finding yourself incarcerated, is to record, have witnesses, get media exposure and file a criminal complaint.

My admiration for LEOs writ large has taken a huge hit of late.

'Land of the free' my ass.......

Ed Bonderenka said...

I agree on all your points.
Driving to work this morn, I considered the "citizen's arrest" tack (don't harm the 'officer', but stop and detain), and you've answered that.
That guy is a bad cop.

Ed Bonderenka said...

It's a life changing decision.

Bunkerville said...

How much more will it take for us to get the lesson as to where we are headed? Re-education camps are next. History tells us that it is the way it works.

Ed Bonderenka said...

I think we know where. It's finding the brake pedal....

DaBlade said...

I would first tell the woman to stop resisting and to submit to arrest. But I can see that unraveling and also see myself possibly sitting in a cell.

Ed Bonderenka said...

I think I would have started out arguing with the "student resource officer".
Then end up in jail.
I just talked about this on air and Pascal Fervor just called me and said I could be in danger for saying what I said on air about what I would have done. :)
I'll have to listen to the recording and see what I said.

Kid said...

The proper response is for EVERYONE to not wear a mask.

Ed Bonderenka said...

Radical Fundamentalist Covidianism is almost as dangerous as Islam. It sure has made more inroads.

Mustang said...

I'm in CI's corner. Lawsuit, baby ... As for the copper, see how well affirmative action is working? We need more of that stuff. Personally, I question the requirement to obey a bad law, by which I mean, an un-Constitutional law. CI's approach is the best one, since even corrupt and stupid police hate it when you shoot at them.

Ed Bonderenka said...

"even corrupt and stupid police hate it when you shoot at them."
Well, there is that....

Old NFO said...

That is a lose/lose... sigh

Ducky's here said...

You guys are a stitch.

Constitutional Insurgent said...

That’s all you got? Nothing on the actual topic? No insight into how a Liberal would react in that situation?

Koji D. Kanemoto said...

I have been pulled over quite a number of times for traffic infractions like tint, no muffler, speeding, etc. However, not once was I harassed, cuffed or tazed... because I complied. There is a place to argue and that's in court.

I have no true idea what prompted this cop to taze her. All I know is I would not have freely decided to put me into a position of getting a cop upset me.

Ed Bonderenka said...

Good point CI.

Ed Bonderenka said...

That's a good point.
But he should have ignored her.